I lay it down a…
I lay it down as a position which cannot be controverted. First, that the agreement of all the parts of a story does not prove that story to be true, because the parts may agree and the whole may be false; secondly, that the disagreement of the parts of a story proves that the whole cannot be true. —Thomas Paine “Age of Reason”
Now that is some hard-core skepticism! lol
What does everyone think? Can that statement be controverted?